![]() There is no sense to overpay for a professional card for rendering – you will not get a real gain in the speed of rendering but you will lose a lot of money. The main criterion, besides the price, of course, is the number of CUDA cores – the more the better. I have the impression that there are fewer problems with NVIDIA video cards, so I propose to choose among them. For example, VRay help section tells about the choice clearly: “It is highly recommended to use the CUDA engine on nVidia GPUs.” So it always makes sense to find out in advance what exactly you will use. ![]() The main difference is in the supported technologies as NVIDIA video cards use CUDA, while AMD video cards – OpenGL. Here, the two main competitors are AMD and NVIDIA again. GPU rendering supports iRay, V-Ray RT, Cycles in Blender, and other visualizers. In some cases, rendering using the video card works much faster than the one done by the CPU. But in 3D visualization, in the parameter of combining performance on one price unit, they go far ahead. In single-streamed tasks, they give the same performance or worse at the same frequencies. ![]() The comparison shows that the AMD processor for the same money is faster in the rendering in 1.5 times! This does not mean that the Ryzen 7 processors are the best in everything. From Intel processors, it is a family of Core i7:įrom AMD processors, it is Ryzen 5 and 7: Multi-core processor: the more cores, the better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |